The History of India
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Friday, March 16, 2012
1600s: Heera Raja and The Nagvanshis of Chotanagpur
The Nagvanshis were the rulers of Chotanagpur since the beginning of the Christian era. The first Nagvanshi ruler was Phani Mukut Rai born in 64 AD. He was the adopted son of Madra Munda, the Partha Raja of Sutiambe. It is said that when Phani Mukut Rai was found near a tank as a newborn, a hooded kobra (Nag) was protecting him. Perhaps this was the reason why he and his successors were called the Nagvanshis. Phani Mukut Rai ruled from 83AD to 162 AD. Till date, four Nagvanshavalis are available that prove that the Nagvanshis ruled over Chotanagpur plateau in India for close to two thousand years, from the 1st century to 1951 when the Zamindari was abolished. (This would put the Nagvanshis among the top dynasties that ruled the longest in the world, which include the Dulo clan in Bulgaria, The Imperial House of Japan and Hong Bang dynasty of Korea).I belong to Rajput caste in Una district of Himachal Pradesh. As per records maintained at Haridwar, Kurukshetra and Pehowa (Haryana) or Vansha is recorded as Takshak, subcaste as Bhadiar, Gotra Kaushal and we are also known as Takhi Bhadiar. Our Kul devi is Mansa Devi, the sister of Takshaka. As per tradition, we are said to have come from the south and our king is reported to be Har Har Dev or Hari Har Dev, about 1000 years back. It is not known from which southern state of India we have come from, to the present district of Una and earlier it was district Hosiarpur in the state of Punjab. Can anybody help?
i have heard this also from my grandfather maharaja c.s.n. shahdeo in ratu palace ranchi maharaja DURJAN shah was a great johari in mughal era
Ashoka was Nagvanshi and Nagvanshi were Buddhists.
the Brahmnical foundation of Anadi i.e. we first. This is a clue given to the Intellectuals of the movement of Social Transformation, economic emancipation, cultural change and cultural control. Bahujan vision would be giving many more 'clues' in future for action. is a must for understanding and firmly grounding ourselves, and . Tracing our " i.e. to the interpretation of find the " within the origin of 4 varnas. But for those who want to create their history,Post-Vedic history
Babasaheb Dr. Ambedkar has categorically brought out the political history of the Mauryas as Nagvanshis in 'The Triumph of Brahmanism: Regicide or the birth of counter-Revolution', chapter 11, Revolution and counter-Revolution (Ref. BAWS, Vol. 3 P. 267-268). To quote Babasaheb :
“Let me therefore briefly recount the salient facts of Indian history. For it is important that everyone who was able to understand the history of India must know that it is nothing but the history of struggle for supremacy between Brahmanism and Buddhism.
The Aryans have left very little their political achievements for history to speak of. The political history of India begins with the rise of a non-Aryan people called Nagas, who were a powerful people, whom the Aryans were unable to conquer, with whom the Aryans had to make peace, and whom the Aryans were compelled to recognise as their equals. Whatever "fame and glory" India achieved in ancient times in the political field, the credit for it goes entirely to the Non-Aryan Nagas. It is they who made India great and glorious in the annals of the world.
The first landmark in India's political history is the emergence of the Kingdom of Magadha in Bihar in the year 642 B.C. The founder of the kingdom of Magadha is known by the name of Sisunag and belonged to the non-Aryan race of Nagas. From the small beginning made by Sisunag, this kingdom of Magadha grew in its extent under the capable rulers of this sisunag dynasty. Under Bimbisara the Fifth ruler of this dynasty the kingdom grew into an Empire and came to be as the Empire of Magadha. The Sisunag dynasty continued to rule the kingdom till 413 B.C. In that year the reigning Emperor of Susunag Dynasty Mahananda was killed by an adventurer called Nanda. Nanda usurped the throne of Magadha and founded the Nanda Dynasty. This Nanda Dynasty ruled over the empire of Magdha upto 322 B.C. The last Nanda king was deposed by Chandragupta who founded the Maurya Dynasty. Chandragupta was related to the family of the last ruling emperor of the sisunag Dynasty so that it may be said that the revolution effected by Chandragupta was really a resoration of the Naga Empire of Magadha.
The Mauryas by their conquests enormously extended the boundaries of this empire of Magdha which they inherited. So vast became the growth of this Empire under Ashoka, the Empire began to be known by another name. It was called the Maurya Empire or the Empire of Ashoka. (ref. : BAWS Vol. 3, P. 267-268, Mah. Govt. Pub.)
Here, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar categorically proves the Mauryas and Ashoka as Nagvanshi. Thus the chronology of Nagvanshi non-Aryan rule
The ruins of the temples in Navratangarh (Doisa) (Sisai block, Gumla), traditional abode of the Nagvanshi Rajas of Chotanagpur, does not suggest any Buddhist link.
brother what you said that is mention only on the book which was written by Dr Ambedkar on the other hand Nagvanshis are mention in purans as aryas Kings which is genealogically proven, According to another view Nagvanshi is the sub group of Suryavanshi
Hello, I am doing some research on this topic. This may sound a bit stupid but I just need some confirmation. The place of 'Kokhara' that has been mentioned in this excerpt is it the same as Kukara which was what Jharkhand was called before the Britishers took over India?
Your help will be much appreciated. Thanks
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment